Keep your ERP or CRM as the primary system
Kairoseth Fiscal acts as the adaptation layer. The source system keeps customers, invoices, and operations while the bridge centralizes the fiscal workflow.
Kairoseth Fiscal receives invoices from your existing system, applies server-side mapping and preflight, and centralizes idempotency, status, reconciliation, and presentation in the same fiscal engine.
Integration is selected by the capabilities your system already has, not by a closed list of brands.
Kairoseth Fiscal acts as the adaptation layer. The source system keeps customers, invoices, and operations while the bridge centralizes the fiscal workflow.
If the ERP exposes an API, use server-to-server integration. If it can emit HTTP events, signed webhooks decouple the flow without moving fiscal secrets into the source system.
Your ERP does not need to adopt Puente field names. The profile maps source fields into the canonical contract while organization and installation identity remain server-authoritative.
The ERP can validate structure, dates, amounts, and configuration before a fiscal record exists.
A stable key prevents duplicates and, when a remote outcome is uncertain, the bridge checks status before deciding what to do next.
The architecture can add system-specific connectors without duplicating AEAT rules. Database read and Local Agent routes remain roadmap items until their technical gates are completed.
We do not activate a fiscal integration based on assumptions. We validate real samples and keep a clear boundary between ERP facts and server-side configuration.
API, webhook, or a dedicated integration depending on actual capabilities; the route is not selected by brand.
Map ERP fields into InvoiceIntent and keep decisions the source system must not make on the server.
Validate real samples without fiscal side effects until data, numbering, and mapping are coherent.
Once opened, every operation keeps idempotency, status, reconciliation, and presentation through the same fiscal core.
For legacy ERP systems, the roadmap includes a Local Agent, read-only database access, watch folders, and SFTP. Those routes will only be offered after their own tests and gates; until then we assess actual system capabilities and use API/webhooks when available.
For teams that want to adapt their management software without replacing it.
No. Kairoseth Fiscal is designed so the ERP remains the business source and connects through API, webhook, or a compatible adapter.
No. The ERP sends a neutral contract and the fiscal layer handles transformations, controls, and transport supported by Puente VeriFactu.
A server-side MappingProfile maps your fields into InvoiceIntent so the ERP does not have to be redesigned around bridge internals.
Yes, when it contains the necessary commercial facts and can expose them through a supported route. Integration is capability-first, not label-first.
The product is preparing additional Local Agent, read-only database, and watch-folder routes. Those remain roadmap items until their technical gates are completed.
Each operation uses stable idempotency and the bridge reconciles existing records before reissuing when an outcome is uncertain.
Yes. v0.1.0 is published and we can diagnose fit, define mapping, and validate preflight. AEAT production remains controlled access and requires a separate technical and regulatory gate; completing the diagnostic never enables it automatically.
Kairoseth separates identity, organization scope, product roles and product capabilities. A login route, browser state or AI response never becomes an authorization boundary by itself.
Customer resources and access are resolved inside an active organization context rather than treated as global account state.
Owner, Admin and Member authority is assigned per product. Organization membership alone does not automatically grant every product.
Sensitive access, policy and capability decisions remain authoritative on the server instead of trusting client UI state or model output.
Capabilities that can act are introduced behind explicit grants, staged gates and audit rather than implied autonomy.
Review the customer-facing policies that define privacy, security reporting, acceptable use and the current legal operating framework.
We review API, events, numbering, fiscal data, and workflow to choose the integration path with the least possible change.